The only defense available to the spouse who acquires the estate, best to prove that the personal right to full individual ownership of the property preceded the creditors` claim. In ensuing this divorce agreement, the parties represent and warrant that the parties have resolved any issues or disagreements regarding the equitable division of tangible property. At the time of the coming into force of this divorce agreement, the husband who left the marital residence on the date of separation has removed from the marital residence all the tangible property to which he is entitled and the wife does not collect any rights related to that property, now or in the future. – The agreement on the transfer of the half share of the estate, in accordance with the court order, binds the former owner and the spouse who acquires the property, but does not transfer ownership of half of the share of the spouse who acquires the property. The petitioner and the respondent agree to waive all rights that each may have in each other`s pension. All other age accounts that are now held and maintained individually are and will remain the separate property of the spouse in whose name the property is now held. Unfortunately, we often come up against divorce decrees that deal very little, if at all, with immovable property. This results in possible deadlocks between the parties and limits the subsequent management of the property by the parties. . . .