For many participants, the experience of listening to others with respect and attention was a strong experience in broadening perspective and building empathy, whether they changed their minds or not. This ability to hear differences, without forcing consensus or focusing too much on disagreements, is an extremely important capacity for any educator who works in a diverse environment. Highlighting and naming differences without attempting to change them can be the backbone of a respectful pluralist community, and this is especially true when Israel or another sensitive subject is the subject. Building empathy is an essential part of professional and personal learning for day teachers, especially when they seek deep and useful conversations about their practice. Kakavé, C. (1993). Negotiating differences by the Greeks in conversations and class speech. (Doc. D. D. essay), Washington, DC: Georgetown University. For each of these teachers, it was an experience of support and energy to be in dialogue with like-minded colleagues.
This helped them deepen their professional learning by guiding you to articulate a philosophy in a way that could lead to more targeted educational choices and encourage another to boldly change curricula, which she had hesitated to make. The underlined expression expresses …. A. Sympathy B. Possibility C. Disagreement D. Uncertainty Dialogue 8 Indah: Hey Hanna! I`d like to talk to you about something. Hanna: Hey Indah! What`s the matter? Indah: You know it`s Julian`s birthday tomorrow? I want to give him a new pair of shoes as a gift. How do you feel about that? Hanna: Oh really? I knew it! It`s a good idea, but I see he already has a lot of shoes.
What if you buy him a new watch? I see him putting on the same watch as every day. Indah: Oh yes, that`s a really good idea! Thank you, Hanna. Hanna: You`re welcome, Indah. With these ideas in mind, a detailed note was made on the 222 recordings. The texts of the speakers and their agents represented about half a million common words, and each word was timed in the flow of the given language, a particularly useful characteristic of the body for associating non-verbal events with the corresponding text. The text has also been spoken for morphology and syntax with notes, another important feature that, because of its information on linguistic errors and incompleteness, can contribute, during a conversation, to learn more about the cognitive flow of linguistic behavior and to the development of more natural interactive systems.